Regent Park was the first public housing project in Canada, developed in the late 1940’s to replace the Victorian slums that existed in the area with humane and safe housing.
The Fugitive Glue Light Fixture OH-85 [SITE-1] nicknamed “Dogbone” has been designed to resemble the shape of those first public housing buildings that are still in use today.
Kinda awesome.
Walking in America: What scientists know about how pedestrians really behave. - Slate Magazine
Thank heavens someone is working on this. It’s nice to finally have something to say to those who think I take my jaywalking casually. It’s an energy maximization thing, people, and I’m evolutionarily adapted to do it, not because I’m an anarchist or some shit.
When Los Angeles painted a 1.5-mile strip of Spring Street neon green last year, it was hailed as a major step in the city’s effort to have cars and bicycles share the road. But now, the bike lane has become a symbol of how hard it can be to reserve room for cyclists in a city dominated by the car.
The green lane has been criticized by the film industry, which frequently uses the stretch of Spring Street, in the heart of old downtown, as a stand-in for other cities and eras. Producers say the eye-catching lane makes it more difficult to use Spring as a substitute for, say, a Manhattan street.
“If you’re depicting ‘anywhere U.S.A.’ or anywhere in the world — that is our claim to fame here in California,” said Ed Duffy, business agent for Teamsters Local 399, which represents location managers, casting agents and studio drivers.
[…]
The Spring Street lane is part of a larger campaign by City Hall to make streets safer and more inviting to cyclists.
The arrogance of the film industry is appalling, and as a member of the film industry, it’s embarrassing to me.
Hey, film industry: BACK LOTS. DO YOU HAVE THEM?
God forbid we invest in making our city safer for cyclists… won’t someone think of the precious film industry?
What’s kind of funny about this? With New York and LA both installing bike lanes, for those filming somewhere without bike lanes (say, Toronto), it will be harder for them to be factually accurate without putting effort into stalling blue lanes, planters and large crosswalks, even if they capture the “feel” with imported NY taxis and other set dressing, etc. That may pass with the audiences who are used to seeing NY in media and haven’t seen things like the High Line in real life.
Also, from a place-making perspective, I’m also kind of stoked this is happening. No two cities install the same bike lane, because no two cities have the same combination of cycling, driving and local government cultures. They arise from local circumstances, not highway design standard manuals. It makes cities less interchangeable — and, so it appears, this particular aspect of the film industry is discomfited by the development.
Vancouver built part of its reputation as Hollywood North on that ability to pass, and if the reality is that that is getting harder and harder all the time because cities are nurturing their own individual urban identities… Bring it on, I say. There are more than enough places, I’m sure, that would be more than willing to bend to filmmakers’ will to be generic to the detriment of the quality of life of their local tax-paying citizens. (Again, the aforementioned Toronto comes to mind…)
[As a sci-fi nerd who grew up laughing at re-dressed neighbourhood Vancouver locations passing as alternate reality “San Francisco’s” on Sliders and a planning student, simply, I could not resist. Also, I’m going to be in LA in about three weeks and probably want to do a bicycle tour while I’m there, so this will be very relevant to me, very soon!]
There have been a few voices advocating for light rail on its own merits, even absent funding considerations. [In addition to former TTC Chief General Manager Gary Webster; and former centre-right Scarborough councillor (and budget chief under David Miller) David Soknacki,] current councillor and TTC board member John Parker has been using his Twitter feed to trumpet the economic development that flows from street-level transit.
[…]These voices have been few and far too rare. Too many people who care about transit in Toronto, who want to see it developed based on the best available research and evidence, have just conceded Rob Ford’s basic premise throughout this entire debate [that subways are inherently, intrinsically better].
Perhaps they did so out of a desire to be conciliatory […]. But the effect has been to make a debate that should have been, could have been, largely sane and rational and fact-oriented, utterly, perhaps ruinously ideological and divisive.
How the Left Has Been Letting Rob Ford Win on Transit via Torontoist
While there are times when it may seem to some that the debate in Vancouver on SkyTrains is similar, I would argue that it’s actually very much not, as Jarrett Walker has pointed out, because of the service frequency and cost tradeoffs that differentiate SkyTrain from subways and LRT or streetcar. That said, when it comes to rapid transit to UBC, the same street-level impact arguments that support LRT on Broadway tend to get lost in the multiple account evaluation… (Unless, of course, you are Patrick Condon).
I do also think it’s kind of fascinating that, by sheer force of the history of the debate here, the economic contribution of the transit system as an employer is a total non-consideration in Metro Vancouver; whereas (so I’ve heard) it actually matters a bit to people in other constituencies.
A great summary of my own anxieties about the “OMG DRIVERLESS CARS!!11!!!” via Jarrett Walker in this article: Why Driverless Cars Will Increase Tensions in Cities and Suburbs Alike - The Atlantic Cities.
I’ve been carefully stepping around online. I don’t think it’s all that unrelated to questions like, “Why isn’t Google Plus more successful?” The common elements are the gap between our idealized models of human behaviour and, well, what human behaviour is actually like.
The Myth of the Disconnected Life - Jason Farman
Farman’s nailed it here. It’s possible to get too much of a good thing, for all the good things we’ve ever made. But they still do some pretty gosh darn good stuff, and we risk throwing the baby out with the bathwater by seeing doom in the new. (We always had that potential, sillies.)
Mark Kingwell, Concrete Reveries (emphasis mine):
Indeed, a given piece of architecture was often here before us and will likely be here when we are gone, so short is our individual stay. Unlike political participation, even on a positive (some would say romantic) view of able and dedicated democratic citizens, architecture is not optional. It influences us in countless ways both obvious and subtle. We cannot understand ourselves without it, for this is is where we eat and sleep and work and raise our children. And we cannot understand the built environment without confronting ourselves: not rational abstractions thinking rationally, but embodied persons. Persons, that is to say, with an upright posture that gives us left and right, in front and behind, down and up; persons who find some rooms oppressive and others uplifting, some spaces intimidating and others cozy; persons who perspire and breathe, laugh or grow angry while waiting in traffic. Persons who cross boundaries and enact them too, in the embodied, temporal being that they are.